{"id":4739,"date":"2019-06-24T08:00:51","date_gmt":"2019-06-24T13:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/braindevs.net\/blog\/blog\/?p=4739"},"modified":"2019-06-14T13:05:59","modified_gmt":"2019-06-14T18:05:59","slug":"powerful-evidence-self-control-training-works-and-changes-brains","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.braindevs.net\/blog\/powerful-evidence-self-control-training-works-and-changes-brains\/","title":{"rendered":"Powerful Evidence: Self-Control Training Works &#8212; and Changes Brains"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Whenever we put a lot of effort into a project, we really want to believe that it helped.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/braindevs.net\/blog\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/AdobeStock_116918167_Credit.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-4744\" src=\"https:\/\/braindevs.net\/blog\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/AdobeStock_116918167_Credit-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.braindevs.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/AdobeStock_116918167_Credit-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.braindevs.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/AdobeStock_116918167_Credit-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.braindevs.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/AdobeStock_116918167_Credit-1024x683.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>For that reason, we might somehow overlook the signs that our efforts fell short. Or, we might exaggerate skimpy data to suggest that we succeeded.<\/p>\n<p>To overcome these all-too-human tendencies, we need well designed research to gather and analyze data. The only way to demonstrate <em>success<\/em> is to look hard for <em>failure<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h2>Taking It Up a Notch<\/h2>\n<p>To look\u00a0<em>especially<\/em> hard for failure, we might look at <strong>two different kinds of evidence<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>For example: does <strong>self-control training<\/strong> work?<\/p>\n<p>To answer this question, let&#8217;s start by having\u00a011-year-olds go through a self-control training program. At the same time, we&#8217;ll identify a control group that doesn&#8217;t get the training.<\/p>\n<p>We can see if the training worked in two different ways.<\/p>\n<p><strong>First<\/strong>: several years later, have those children (now 25 years old!) provide information about their lives. Have they completed high school? College? Do they have a job? Have they been arrested? Do they frequently get in fights?<\/p>\n<p>We can also have their parents fill out similar surveys. Oh, and we&#8217;ll have the control group fill out surveys as well.<\/p>\n<p>Are the children who got self-control training likelier to have more education and a job? Less likely to harm themselves and others? If yes, those differences suggests that they used those self-control strategies well.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Second<\/strong>: we can\u00a0<em>look at their brains<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>In particular, we have decades of research showing the importance of a particular brain region for self control.<\/p>\n<p>Roughly speaking, we want self-control regions of the brain &#8212; the prefrontal cortex (PFC) &#8212; to communicate well with the emotional drivers of human behavior. Better PFC communication means better self-control.<\/p>\n<p>That brain region is in the middle (<em>medial<\/em>) part of the underside (<em>ventral<\/em>) of the PFC. So, we call it the ventromedial prefrontal cortex: vm-PFC. (Important note: neuroscience is\u00a0<em>fantastically<\/em> complicated. This summary is a very streamlined version of a wildly intricate web of brain connectivity.)<\/p>\n<p>So, after we survey the students who went through self-control training, we can have them hang out in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) gizmo.<\/p>\n<p>Our hypothesis: trained students should have <em>better vm-PFC connectivity<\/em> between the PFC and brain regions that process emotions.<\/p>\n<h2>Today&#8217;s Research<\/h2>\n<p>A team of 14 researchers have in fact <a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/cdev.13154\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">done all that<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>An organization in rural Georgia called &#8220;Strong African American Families&#8221; wanted to improve the prospects of children living in poverty. They developed a program that included training for parents, and for their 11-year-old children.<\/p>\n<p>Parents learned about &#8220;emotional support, [and] high levels of monitoring and control.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The children &#8220;focused on forming goals for the future and making plans to attain them.&#8221; They also learned about strategies to use when encountering racism.<\/p>\n<p>14 years later (!!), the researchers gathered both kinds of data described above. That is: the children (now 25) filled out surveys. And the had an fMRI scan to measure vm-PFC connectivity.<\/p>\n<p>Sure enough, <strong>both measures<\/strong> suggested that the training made a real difference.<\/p>\n<p>That is: the children who had the training did better on measures of adult self-control. And, they had higher levels of vm-PFC connectivity.<\/p>\n<h2>Reasonable Conclusions<\/h2>\n<p>The program run by Strong African American Families was tailored to the circumstances of its participants. We should not, in other words, conclude that their program will work for everyone.<\/p>\n<p>But: we have quite persuasive evidence that their program had the effects it intended &#8212; poor children grew up as more responsible adults than un-trained peers.<\/p>\n<p>And: we have a good neurobiological explanation for the different behavior &#8212; their altered life trajectory included developmental differences in the vm-PFC.<\/p>\n<p>All these findings give us hope that well designed self-control programs can indeed have the effect that we want them to. That&#8217;s not just wishful thinking.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Both survey data and fMRI neuroimaging suggest that a program to help poor children develop self-control skills had real benefits over many years.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":4744,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[14],"class_list":["post-4739","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lb-blog","tag-self-control"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.braindevs.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4739","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.braindevs.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.braindevs.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.braindevs.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.braindevs.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4739"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.braindevs.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4739\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4746,"href":"https:\/\/www.braindevs.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4739\/revisions\/4746"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.braindevs.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4744"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.braindevs.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4739"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.braindevs.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4739"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.braindevs.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4739"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}